LITERAL · TRAINING COMPANION / ANCHOR PUBLIC SAFETY

No Good Options — Field Guide

Role-based training companion for dispatch, law enforcement, EMS, ED staff, hospital security, families, navigators, and supervisors. Educational material only; it does not replace law, medical protocols, agency policy, emergency judgment, or formal certification.

Open printable Crisis Access Toolkit →

PACE + the three-question split

PPause

Reduce speed, extra voices, crowding, and assumptions long enough to identify the actual problem.

AAssess

Immediate danger, medical cause, communication barrier, sensory load, victimization, intoxication, injury, and environmental contributors.

CCommunicate

One lead voice, concrete words, one question at a time, processing time, AAC/writing/visuals, confirm understanding.

EEngage

Complete the necessary lawful/medical task with the least avoidable friction and hand off clearly.

Always keep separate

1 · THREATWhat can hurt someone now?

Weapon, fire, traffic, active assault, severe self-injury, medical instability, unsafe location.

2 · TASKWhat must the responder actually accomplish?

Welfare check, investigation, transport, arrest, missing-person recovery, medical assessment.

3 · PRESSUREWhat can change without defeating the task?

Speakers, proximity, wording, lights, touch, pace, eye-contact demand, communication channel.

4 · HANDOFFWhat does the next setting need to know?

Baseline, current change, safety risk, communication, medical information, what helps, next owner.

Dispatch / 911 training lane

Extract facts that change the response.

“Tell me the immediate safety problem first. Then tell me how the person communicates and what makes the situation worse.”

Patrol / SRO training lane

“My job is to solve the safety task. I can reduce extra pressure without giving up the safety task.”

EMS training lane

Emergency department training lane

TRIAGEBaseline + change

What is normal? What changed? What medical red flags exist?

COMMUNICATIONUsable method

Speech, writing, AAC, visuals, one question, processing time, support person.

ENVIRONMENTReduce avoidable load

Quiet area where feasible, fewer room changes, lower unnecessary noise/light, familiar regulation tools if safe.

DISCHARGEClose the loop

Owner, medication changes, warning signs, referral, date, fallback.

Hospital security training lane

Family / caregiver training lane

Prepare one page, not a biography.

“I can give you the three facts that change safety and communication right now.”

Supervisor / quality-improvement lane

Review failures that are normally invisible.

Use aggregated patterns to improve policy and training. Do not create a permanent law-enforcement dossier of private disability history merely because the person once had a crisis.

45-minute facilitated training plan

0–5 MINFrame the job

Define PACE and the difference between immediate danger, required task, avoidable pressure, and handoff. State that accommodation never means ignoring a weapon, traffic hazard, medical instability, or lawful duty.

5–15 MINInterpretation errors

Use examples: delayed speech, no eye contact, pacing, reaching for a phone/AAC device, bolting, shutdown, sudden self-injury. Ask what each behavior proves—and what it does not prove.

15–25 MINCommunication practice

Run the same scene twice: command-heavy and then one lead voice + concrete instruction + processing time + usable communication method. Compare observable results without assuming one method always works.

25–35 MINMixed scenario

Do not announce the diagnosis or the correct answer. Learners must identify threat, medical uncertainty, communication access, caregiver evidence, autonomy, and next destination.

35–40 MINHandoff

Practice a 30-second handoff to EMS/ED/crisis staff: what happened, actual hazard, baseline/current change, communication method, relevant medical information, interventions tried, and unresolved concerns.

40–45 MINDebrief + documentation

Ask what added pressure, what reduced uncertainty, what evidence changed the decision, and what must be documented for the next team and supervisor.

Scenario performance rubric

90-minute cross-system workshop

This is an ANCHOR/LITERAL proposed teaching format for agencies or partner groups that want more than an awareness lecture. It should be adapted to local policy, instructor qualifications, audience role, and approved training requirements.

0–10 MINSystem map

911, 988, CMHC crisis response, CSU, EMS, ED, outpatient services, and what each role can and cannot do. Identify local gaps rather than teaching an imaginary statewide response.

10–25 MINThreat / task / pressure

Use four rapid vignettes. Learners name the actual hazard, required task, and one avoidable pressure. Instructor challenges unsupported assumptions.

25–40 MINCommunication access lab

Rotate speech, delayed response, typing/AAC, gesture, and caregiver-supported communication. Practice one lead voice, concrete language, processing time, and confirmation of understanding.

40–55 MINMedical differential lab

Present new self-injury, agitation, shutdown, or confusion without telling learners whether the cause is pain, seizure, intoxication, panic, overload, victimization, or psychiatric illness.

55–70 MINDestination + handoff

Teams decide what destination/service is actually appropriate based on the facts and local capability, then deliver a 30-second handoff.

70–82 MINCaregiver / autonomy conflict

Practice using caregiver baseline evidence while directly communicating with an adult through their usable method and recognizing when legal authority or safeguarding requires clarification.

82–90 MINAfter-action review

Score the scenario, identify avoidable escalation, document observations, and name one policy/system problem the individual responder could not solve alone.

30-second handoff drills

The next setting should receive the facts that change assessment and safety. Practice delivering this without a five-minute biography.

POLICE → EMSWhat happened + actual hazard + communication.

“We responded for elopement near traffic. No weapon seen. The person is currently non-speaking but uses a phone to type. Parent reports this is below baseline. No known injury. We reduced voices/proximity and they stopped running.”

EMS → EDBaseline/current change + medical + interventions.

Include pain/injury/seizure/medication/allergy facts, usable communication, sensory/touch factors, restraints or medications used if relevant, and what remains unexplained.

ED → HOME / NAVIGATORWhat was found + what remains + owner.

Diagnosis/treatment when known, medication changes, warning signs, next referral, responsible team, timing/check-back, and fallback if follow-up fails.

FAMILY → RESPONDERThree facts that change the scene.

“She is speaking less than baseline. She may bolt if crowded. One person speaking and no sudden touch usually lowers the overload. No weapon; she hit her head on the wall twice.”

Instructor calibration questions

Calibration matters because a scenario rubric that rewards different things depending on the instructor is not a reliable training standard.

Knowledge check

QUESTION 1An autistic adult does not answer an officer's question and looks away. What does that prove?
Show answer

By itself, very little about intent or threat. Continue the lawful/safety assessment and consider communication method, processing time, sensory load, fear, medical state, intoxication, victimization, and other relevant factors.

QUESTION 2A caregiver says “he cannot communicate,” but the adult is typing. What next?
Show answer

Use caregiver baseline information, but attempt direct communication through the adult's usable method. Consider safeguarding/coercion only if facts support it. Caregiver knowledge is evidence, not automatic authority over an adult.

QUESTION 3Does reducing lights, words, or proximity mean abandoning officer safety?
Show answer

No. PACE changes avoidable pressure only when it is consistent with the actual safety task, lawful authority, and agency procedure.

QUESTION 4A non-speaking person suddenly begins severe self-injury. Is “autism behavior” enough explanation?
Show answer

No. Protect immediate safety and evaluate new medical, pain, injury, seizure, medication, intoxication, abuse, or other causes as clinically indicated.

QUESTION 5Why is the ER handoff part of public-safety access?
Show answer

Because the next team needs the facts that change assessment and safety. If communication method, baseline, force/restraint exposure, medication, caregiver evidence, or unresolved medical concerns disappear at the door, the receiving team may restart from a less accurate picture.

QUESTION 6What makes a discharge “closed loop”?
Show answer

A clear next action, responsible owner/team, expected timing or check-back point, relevant records/instructions, and a fallback route if the next step fails.

Trainer research desk

This companion is designed to crosswalk with existing Arkansas training and agency policy. It is not a substitute certification course. Any formal adoption, lesson-hour requirement, policy change, or field protocol requires review and approval by the responsible authority.