Weapon, fire, traffic, active assault, severe self-injury, medical instability, unsafe location.
No Good Options — Field Guide
Role-based training companion for dispatch, law enforcement, EMS, ED staff, hospital security, families, navigators, and supervisors. Educational material only; it does not replace law, medical protocols, agency policy, emergency judgment, or formal certification.
PACE + the three-question split
Reduce speed, extra voices, crowding, and assumptions long enough to identify the actual problem.
Immediate danger, medical cause, communication barrier, sensory load, victimization, intoxication, injury, and environmental contributors.
One lead voice, concrete words, one question at a time, processing time, AAC/writing/visuals, confirm understanding.
Complete the necessary lawful/medical task with the least avoidable friction and hand off clearly.
Always keep separate
Welfare check, investigation, transport, arrest, missing-person recovery, medical assessment.
Speakers, proximity, wording, lights, touch, pace, eye-contact demand, communication channel.
Baseline, current change, safety risk, communication, medical information, what helps, next owner.
Dispatch / 911 training lane
Extract facts that change the response.
“Tell me the immediate safety problem first. Then tell me how the person communicates and what makes the situation worse.”
Patrol / SRO training lane
- Do not treat eye contact, delayed answers, repetitive movement, or unusual prosody as evidence of guilt or threat by themselves.
- Do not assume autism explains every symptom. Check pain, injury, seizure, intoxication, victimization, medical distress, and other causes.
- When circumstances permit, preserve access to AAC/communication devices.
- One lead voice. One concrete instruction. Processing time.
- Caregiver information can be useful; the person remains a separate source of information and, for adults, may have their own decision-making rights.
- Document observable facts, not moral labels such as “violent for no reason” or “refused to cooperate” without describing what actually happened.
“My job is to solve the safety task. I can reduce extra pressure without giving up the safety task.”
EMS training lane
- Baseline vs new change is clinical information.
- Ask how pain is expressed and whether the person can localize symptoms.
- Carry medication, allergy, seizure, injury, and communication information into the receiving facility.
- Explain procedures before touch when operationally possible.
- Do not let the autism label substitute for medical assessment.
Emergency department training lane
What is normal? What changed? What medical red flags exist?
Speech, writing, AAC, visuals, one question, processing time, support person.
Quiet area where feasible, fewer room changes, lower unnecessary noise/light, familiar regulation tools if safe.
Owner, medication changes, warning signs, referral, date, fallback.
Hospital security training lane
- Security's task is safety/security—not diagnosis.
- Coordinate with clinical staff before interpreting behavior as a purely security problem.
- Avoid command stacking and unnecessary crowding when the security objective can be achieved with less pressure.
- If physical intervention becomes necessary for immediate safety, reassess as soon as the danger changes and transition back to communication/clinical care.
Family / caregiver training lane
Prepare one page, not a biography.
“I can give you the three facts that change safety and communication right now.”
Supervisor / quality-improvement lane
Review failures that are normally invisible.
Use aggregated patterns to improve policy and training. Do not create a permanent law-enforcement dossier of private disability history merely because the person once had a crisis.
45-minute facilitated training plan
Define PACE and the difference between immediate danger, required task, avoidable pressure, and handoff. State that accommodation never means ignoring a weapon, traffic hazard, medical instability, or lawful duty.
Use examples: delayed speech, no eye contact, pacing, reaching for a phone/AAC device, bolting, shutdown, sudden self-injury. Ask what each behavior proves—and what it does not prove.
Run the same scene twice: command-heavy and then one lead voice + concrete instruction + processing time + usable communication method. Compare observable results without assuming one method always works.
Do not announce the diagnosis or the correct answer. Learners must identify threat, medical uncertainty, communication access, caregiver evidence, autonomy, and next destination.
Practice a 30-second handoff to EMS/ED/crisis staff: what happened, actual hazard, baseline/current change, communication method, relevant medical information, interventions tried, and unresolved concerns.
Ask what added pressure, what reduced uncertainty, what evidence changed the decision, and what must be documented for the next team and supervisor.
Scenario performance rubric
90-minute cross-system workshop
This is an ANCHOR/LITERAL proposed teaching format for agencies or partner groups that want more than an awareness lecture. It should be adapted to local policy, instructor qualifications, audience role, and approved training requirements.
911, 988, CMHC crisis response, CSU, EMS, ED, outpatient services, and what each role can and cannot do. Identify local gaps rather than teaching an imaginary statewide response.
Use four rapid vignettes. Learners name the actual hazard, required task, and one avoidable pressure. Instructor challenges unsupported assumptions.
Rotate speech, delayed response, typing/AAC, gesture, and caregiver-supported communication. Practice one lead voice, concrete language, processing time, and confirmation of understanding.
Present new self-injury, agitation, shutdown, or confusion without telling learners whether the cause is pain, seizure, intoxication, panic, overload, victimization, or psychiatric illness.
Teams decide what destination/service is actually appropriate based on the facts and local capability, then deliver a 30-second handoff.
Practice using caregiver baseline evidence while directly communicating with an adult through their usable method and recognizing when legal authority or safeguarding requires clarification.
Score the scenario, identify avoidable escalation, document observations, and name one policy/system problem the individual responder could not solve alone.
30-second handoff drills
The next setting should receive the facts that change assessment and safety. Practice delivering this without a five-minute biography.
“We responded for elopement near traffic. No weapon seen. The person is currently non-speaking but uses a phone to type. Parent reports this is below baseline. No known injury. We reduced voices/proximity and they stopped running.”
Include pain/injury/seizure/medication/allergy facts, usable communication, sensory/touch factors, restraints or medications used if relevant, and what remains unexplained.
Diagnosis/treatment when known, medication changes, warning signs, next referral, responsible team, timing/check-back, and fallback if follow-up fails.
“She is speaking less than baseline. She may bolt if crowded. One person speaking and no sudden touch usually lowers the overload. No weapon; she hit her head on the wall twice.”
Instructor calibration questions
Calibration matters because a scenario rubric that rewards different things depending on the instructor is not a reliable training standard.
Knowledge check
Show answer
By itself, very little about intent or threat. Continue the lawful/safety assessment and consider communication method, processing time, sensory load, fear, medical state, intoxication, victimization, and other relevant factors.
Show answer
Use caregiver baseline information, but attempt direct communication through the adult's usable method. Consider safeguarding/coercion only if facts support it. Caregiver knowledge is evidence, not automatic authority over an adult.
Show answer
No. PACE changes avoidable pressure only when it is consistent with the actual safety task, lawful authority, and agency procedure.
Show answer
No. Protect immediate safety and evaluate new medical, pain, injury, seizure, medication, intoxication, abuse, or other causes as clinically indicated.
Show answer
Because the next team needs the facts that change assessment and safety. If communication method, baseline, force/restraint exposure, medication, caregiver evidence, or unresolved medical concerns disappear at the door, the receiving team may restart from a less accurate picture.
Show answer
A clear next action, responsible owner/team, expected timing or check-back point, relevant records/instructions, and a fallback route if the next step fails.
Trainer research desk
This companion is designed to crosswalk with existing Arkansas training and agency policy. It is not a substitute certification course. Any formal adoption, lesson-hour requirement, policy change, or field protocol requires review and approval by the responsible authority.